End-to-end flow
JT121549
One inquiry, all stages. Each box below is the actual artifact persisted by the pipeline — not a mockup. The brief asks: "does Kine actually work?". This page is the answer.
4 stages
- From:Subject: #mostBody: 134 charsAttachments: image001.png, image411465.gif
Show extracted JSON
{ "language": "no", "intent": "update_quote", "customer": { "company": null, "contact_name": "Morten Steinset", "contact_email": null, "phone": null, "vat_number": null, "address": null }, "items": [ { "line_no": 1, "quantity": 1, "unit": "stk", "product_reference": "BRA00513 (catalog SKU); customer correcting size from DN100 to DN300", "manufacturer": null, "manufacturer_part_no": "BRA00513", "cross_ref_to": null, "specs": { "dimension": "DN300", "pressure_rating": "PN16", "material_body": null, "material_seal": null, "actuation": null, "voltage": null, "torque_or_flow": null, "temperature": null, "thread_or_connection": null, "other": [] }, "missing_fields": [] } ], "application_context": "Internal note from JS Cock staff (Morten Steinset) correcting an existing customer order: size is DN300 (not DN100) for catalog SKU BRA00513 at PN16. Customer identity is not stated in the email body — it sits in the parent thread.", "attachments_referenced": [], "delivery": { "location": null, "deadline": null, "incoterms": null }, "previous_reference": { "is_update_of": null, "notes": "Size correction (DN100 → DN300) on an existing JS Cock customer order" }, "completeness": "unusable", "missing": [ "customer identity (referenced as 'kunden' but not named in body)" ] }- 3ok
Completeness verdict: unusable
Step 03Missing: customer identity (referenced as 'kunden' but not named in body)
unusable- customer identity (referenced as 'kunden' but not named in body)
Rule trace (deterministic)Verdict: unusable · no customer identity (need company name or contact email)- item 1: ✓ quotable — manufacturer part-no or cross-ref present (catalog-resolvable)
Process map: see how this aligns with JS Cock’s diagram →